Meta Pixel Saltar al contenido
Training

Root cause analysis: 5 whys and Ishikawa done right, with a real example and the most common mistakes

The 5 whys and the Ishikawa diagram are the two most taught and most misused root-cause tools: they get filled in ten minutes, land on "lack of training" or "human error" and the problem returns next month. This guide shows how to do them right, with a real late-delivery example and the mistakes that make them useless.

Geedle Team Published 5 min read

Ingeniera de calidad dibujando un diagrama de Ishikawa en un pizarrón mientras un compañero escribe cinco porqués en un rotafolio
In this article
  1. What a root cause is and is not
  2. Before asking why: define the problem with data
  3. The 5 whys, step by step
  4. The Ishikawa diagram, when and how
  5. Verify before acting
  6. The five most common mistakes
  7. From analysis to action plan
  8. Want to bring this to your team?

What a root cause is and is not

The root cause is the condition that, if removed, prevents the problem from recurring. It is not the first explanation that appears ("the driver was late"), nor the most comfortable ("lack of training"), nor the one that blames a person. A simple test: if the "cause" you found can be fixed with a reprimand, it is not the root.

Before asking why: define the problem with data

Before asking why, define what happens, where, when and how much. "Deliveries arrive late" is not a defined problem. "18% of north-route deliveries arrived after the committed time in September, versus 4% on other routes" is. Without data, the 5 whys get answered with opinions.

The 5 whys, step by step

You ask "why?" in a chain until you reach a cause you can act on. With the example:

  1. Why do north-route deliveries arrive late? Because trucks leave after 9:00.
  2. Why do they leave late? Because loading finishes after 8:30.
  3. Why does loading finish late? Because that route's orders are released last.
  4. Why are they released last? Because the system sorts orders by folio and the north route enters its orders later.
  5. Why does it enter them later? Because its customers send orders until 7:00 and the cutoff rule is not defined.

Root cause: there is no order cutoff time per route. Action: define the cutoff and sort loading by route and departure time. Notice that "train the drivers" appears nowhere.

The Ishikawa diagram, when and how

The 5 whys follow a single line; when the problem has several possible causes, the Ishikawa (fishbone) diagram organizes them by category before going deep. The classic categories are method, machine, manpower, material, measurement and environment, but it pays to adapt them to the operation (in services: process, people, system, information, customer, environment).

How to do it right: (1) the data-defined problem at the head of the fish; (2) as a team, brainstorm possible causes by category, without judging; (3) mark the three or four most likely causes; (4) verify each one with data before acting; (5) apply 5 whys to the verified ones. The diagram does not give the cause: it gives the list of hypotheses.

Verify before acting

It is the step almost everyone skips. A cause is a hypothesis until data confirms it: if you believe the order cutoff is the cause, check what time the orders of late deliveries were entered versus on-time ones. If there is no difference, the cause is elsewhere. A Pareto of verified causes says where to start.

The five most common mistakes

MistakeWhat it looks likeHow to fix it
Problem without data"Deliveries arrive late"What, where, when, how much, compared to what
Stopping at "human error""The driver made a mistake"Ask why the process allowed the error
Stopping at "lack of training"Comfortable cause that is never verifiedAsk for evidence: did someone who knew how still fail?
Doing it only at the deskCauses invented far from the processGo to the floor, talk to operators, look at the data
Not verifying the causeAction that does not move the indicatorCheck against data before the action plan

From analysis to action plan

A verified root cause becomes an action with an owner, a date and an indicator that will say whether the problem disappeared (in the example: percentage of late north-route deliveries in November). A simplified one-page A3 holds it all and is the deliverable of the critical thinking and problem solving course; for plants that want the full improvement system, the lean manufacturing course complements it.

Want to bring this to your team?

Each team works a real problem from its operation start to finish: data-based definition, verified root cause and an A3 with an action plan. Message us on WhatsApp, fill out the contact form or open this site's live chat: we send a proposal with three scope options and a closed price in under 24 business hours, with the DC-3 certificate and Geedle Bot included. The full program is at the critical thinking and problem solving course and the catalog at training courses for companies.

Share this article LinkedIn X Facebook WhatsApp
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Keep reading

Gerente en una junta sopesando dos options en una tablet, con tarjetas de sesgo de confirmación, anclaje y exceso de confianza
Training

Cognitive biases in decision making: the seven that cost companies the most and how to counter them

Nobody decides badly on purpose. We decide badly because the mind uses shortcuts that worked for thousands of years and fail in a management meeting: we look for what confirms what we already believed, we anchor on the first figure, we keep investing in what no longer works. These seven biases show up in almost every business decision; for each, how to recognize it and a technique to counter it as a team.

Dos escenas de venta: un vendedor presentando un catálogo con descuento y una vendedora escuchando y tomando notas mientras el cliente habla
Training

Consultative selling vs traditional selling: what changes in the process, the proposal and the margin

Traditional selling presents the product, handles objections and closes; it works at the counter and in simple purchases. In B2B, with long cycles and several decision-makers, it leads to competing on price. Consultative selling reverses the order: it diagnoses before proposing, quantifies the problem and negotiates on value. This guide compares both in the process, the proposal and the margin.

Shall we start with a free assessment?

We review your case and tell you exactly what to improve. We reply the same day — no cost, no commitment.

★

Enter the VIP Zone

Geedle clients only. No passwords: we send a code to your email.

or

Not a client yet? Request your free diagnosis · Privacy notice